<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: site specific and my very specific understanding of installation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanbrilliant.com/site-specific-and-my-very-specific-understanding-of-installation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanbrilliant.com/site-specific-and-my-very-specific-understanding-of-installation/</link>
	<description>The Andrew Goldsworthy of the Coffee Shop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2022 12:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://jonathanbrilliant.com/site-specific-and-my-very-specific-understanding-of-installation/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanbrilliant.com/wordpress/site-specific-and-my-very-specific-understanding-of-installation/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a difference between site-specific and site-responsive sculpture. You are very much about responding to the site, and directing the gaze of the viewer, but in terms of other contextual considerations, you don&#039;t seem that interested. This is not a bad thing, just an observation. I actually like where you&#039;re headed and encourage your further exploration. The white line intervention has lots of potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a difference between site-specific and site-responsive sculpture. You are very much about responding to the site, and directing the gaze of the viewer, but in terms of other contextual considerations, you don&#8217;t seem that interested. This is not a bad thing, just an observation. I actually like where you&#8217;re headed and encourage your further exploration. The white line intervention has lots of potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
